-+ * According to the specifications the minimal time
-+ * should be 450ns so a 1us delay is sufficient.
-+ */
- udelay(1);
- }
-
-From: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 01:37:46 +0000 (-0400)
-Subject: [PATCH] eeprom_93cx6: shorten pulse timing to match spec
-X-Git-Tag: v2.6.23-rc1~1201^2~71
-X-Git-Url: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Ftorvalds%2Flinux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=7e9400f178d291b2208c4ed9aac0f425c1364000
-
-[PATCH] eeprom_93cx6: shorten pulse timing to match spec
-
-93cx6 datasheet available here:
-
- http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/21749F.pdf
-
-Figure 1-1 and Table 1-2 on pages 4-5 indicate that both Clock High
-Time and Clock Low Time have largest minimum times of 450ns.
-
-Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
----
-
-diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c
-index 0d6d742..ac515b0 100644
---- a/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c
-+++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom_93cx6.c
-@@ -42,10 +42,10 @@ static inline void eeprom_93cx6_pulse_high(struct eeprom_93cx6 *eeprom)
-
- /*
- * Add a short delay for the pulse to work.
-- * According to the specifications the minimal time
-- * should be 450ns so a 1us delay is sufficient.