[uml] add support for 3.2
[openwrt.git] / target / linux / generic / patches-2.6.32 / 911-backport-mmc_spi-use-spi-bus-locking-api.patch
1 From 4751c1c74bc7b596db5de0c93be1a22a570145c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
2 From: Ernst Schwab <eschwab@online.de>
3 Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 12:47:46 +0100
4 Subject: [PATCH] spi/mmc_spi: mmc_spi adaptations for SPI bus locking API
5
6 Modification of the mmc_spi driver to use the SPI bus locking API.
7 With this, the mmc_spi driver can be used together with other SPI
8 devices on the same SPI bus. The exclusive access to the SPI bus is
9 now managed in the SPI layer. The counting of chip selects in the probe
10 function is no longer needed.
11
12 Signed-off-by: Ernst Schwab <eschwab@online.de>
13 Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
14 Tested-by: Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org>
15 Tested-by: Antonio Ospite <ospite@studenti.unina.it>
16 ---
17 drivers/mmc/host/mmc_spi.c | 59 ++++++++-----------------------------------
18 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
19
20 --- a/drivers/mmc/host/mmc_spi.c
21 +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mmc_spi.c
22 @@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ mmc_spi_readbytes(struct mmc_spi_host *h
23 host->data_dma, sizeof(*host->data),
24 DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
25
26 - status = spi_sync(host->spi, &host->readback);
27 + status = spi_sync_locked(host->spi, &host->readback);
28
29 if (host->dma_dev)
30 dma_sync_single_for_cpu(host->dma_dev,
31 @@ -540,7 +540,7 @@ mmc_spi_command_send(struct mmc_spi_host
32 host->data_dma, sizeof(*host->data),
33 DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
34 }
35 - status = spi_sync(host->spi, &host->m);
36 + status = spi_sync_locked(host->spi, &host->m);
37
38 if (host->dma_dev)
39 dma_sync_single_for_cpu(host->dma_dev,
40 @@ -684,7 +684,7 @@ mmc_spi_writeblock(struct mmc_spi_host *
41 host->data_dma, sizeof(*scratch),
42 DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
43
44 - status = spi_sync(spi, &host->m);
45 + status = spi_sync_locked(spi, &host->m);
46
47 if (status != 0) {
48 dev_dbg(&spi->dev, "write error (%d)\n", status);
49 @@ -821,7 +821,7 @@ mmc_spi_readblock(struct mmc_spi_host *h
50 DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
51 }
52
53 - status = spi_sync(spi, &host->m);
54 + status = spi_sync_locked(spi, &host->m);
55
56 if (host->dma_dev) {
57 dma_sync_single_for_cpu(host->dma_dev,
58 @@ -1017,7 +1017,7 @@ mmc_spi_data_do(struct mmc_spi_host *hos
59 host->data_dma, sizeof(*scratch),
60 DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
61
62 - tmp = spi_sync(spi, &host->m);
63 + tmp = spi_sync_locked(spi, &host->m);
64
65 if (host->dma_dev)
66 dma_sync_single_for_cpu(host->dma_dev,
67 @@ -1083,6 +1083,9 @@ static void mmc_spi_request(struct mmc_h
68 }
69 #endif
70
71 + /* request exclusive bus access */
72 + spi_bus_lock(host->spi->master);
73 +
74 /* issue command; then optionally data and stop */
75 status = mmc_spi_command_send(host, mrq, mrq->cmd, mrq->data != NULL);
76 if (status == 0 && mrq->data) {
77 @@ -1093,6 +1096,9 @@ static void mmc_spi_request(struct mmc_h
78 mmc_cs_off(host);
79 }
80
81 + /* release the bus */
82 + spi_bus_unlock(host->spi->master);
83 +
84 mmc_request_done(host->mmc, mrq);
85 }
86
87 @@ -1289,23 +1295,6 @@ mmc_spi_detect_irq(int irq, void *mmc)
88 return IRQ_HANDLED;
89 }
90
91 -struct count_children {
92 - unsigned n;
93 - struct bus_type *bus;
94 -};
95 -
96 -static int maybe_count_child(struct device *dev, void *c)
97 -{
98 - struct count_children *ccp = c;
99 -
100 - if (dev->bus == ccp->bus) {
101 - if (ccp->n)
102 - return -EBUSY;
103 - ccp->n++;
104 - }
105 - return 0;
106 -}
107 -
108 static int mmc_spi_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
109 {
110 void *ones;
111 @@ -1337,32 +1326,6 @@ static int mmc_spi_probe(struct spi_devi
112 return status;
113 }
114
115 - /* We can use the bus safely iff nobody else will interfere with us.
116 - * Most commands consist of one SPI message to issue a command, then
117 - * several more to collect its response, then possibly more for data
118 - * transfer. Clocking access to other devices during that period will
119 - * corrupt the command execution.
120 - *
121 - * Until we have software primitives which guarantee non-interference,
122 - * we'll aim for a hardware-level guarantee.
123 - *
124 - * REVISIT we can't guarantee another device won't be added later...
125 - */
126 - if (spi->master->num_chipselect > 1) {
127 - struct count_children cc;
128 -
129 - cc.n = 0;
130 - cc.bus = spi->dev.bus;
131 - status = device_for_each_child(spi->dev.parent, &cc,
132 - maybe_count_child);
133 - if (status < 0) {
134 - dev_err(&spi->dev, "can't share SPI bus\n");
135 - return status;
136 - }
137 -
138 - dev_warn(&spi->dev, "ASSUMING SPI bus stays unshared!\n");
139 - }
140 -
141 /* We need a supply of ones to transmit. This is the only time
142 * the CPU touches these, so cache coherency isn't a concern.
143 *
This page took 0.05195 seconds and 5 git commands to generate.