X-Git-Url: https://git.rohieb.name/openwrt.git/blobdiff_plain/5389989abaa52926b22f9f030d1481df1e73d745..17c7b6c3fdc48301e50d22cc6138ede16bd1be24:/target/linux/ixp4xx-2.6/patches/160-nas100d_artop_temp_fix.patch diff --git a/target/linux/ixp4xx-2.6/patches/160-nas100d_artop_temp_fix.patch b/target/linux/ixp4xx-2.6/patches/160-nas100d_artop_temp_fix.patch deleted file mode 100644 index b7ac4d94c..000000000 --- a/target/linux/ixp4xx-2.6/patches/160-nas100d_artop_temp_fix.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,49 +0,0 @@ -From: Alan Cox -To: Alessandro Zummo -Cc: Jeff Garzik , Alan Cox -Subject: Re: drivers/ata/pata_artop.c -Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 14:25:16 -0400 -User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i - -On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 07:18:31PM +0200, Alessandro Zummo wrote: -> In the discovery phase there's a lot of time spent in the detection -> of the second port. - -The error recovery is a bit determined right now - Tejun's been doing some -work on SRST behaviour and also for the worst cases polled detect so it -should come out ok - -> What's the correct way to inform the driver -> to avoid checking the second port? - -Set the number of ports to 1 in your own tree for now. The real fix is -not to go poking at pata ports if the ret is 0xFF - ---- - drivers/ata/pata_artop.c | 6 ++++++ - 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) - -Index: linux-2.6.19/drivers/ata/pata_artop.c -=================================================================== ---- linux-2.6.19.orig/drivers/ata/pata_artop.c -+++ linux-2.6.19/drivers/ata/pata_artop.c -@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ - #include - #include - #include -+#include - - #define DRV_NAME "pata_artop" - #define DRV_VERSION "0.4.2" -@@ -469,6 +470,11 @@ static int artop_init_one (struct pci_de - pci_read_config_byte(pdev, 0x4a, ®); - pci_write_config_byte(pdev, 0x4a, (reg & ~0x01) | 0x80); - -+ /* NAS100D workaround */ -+#ifdef CONFIG_MACH_NAS100D -+ if (machine_is_nas100d()) -+ ports = 1; -+#endif - } - - BUG_ON(info == NULL);