1 From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@pengutronix.de>
2 Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 09:14:46 +0000 (-0700)
3 Subject: gpio: define gpio_is_valid()
4 X-Git-Tag: v2.6.26-rc1~849
5 X-Git-Url: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Ftorvalds%2Flinux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=e6de1808f8ebfeb7e49f3c5a30cb8f2032beb287
7 gpio: define gpio_is_valid()
9 Introduce a gpio_is_valid() predicate; use it in gpiolib.
11 Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@pengutronix.de>
12 [ use inline function; follow the gpio_* naming convention;
13 work without gpiolib; all programming interfaces need docs ]
14 Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
15 Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
16 Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
19 --- a/Documentation/gpio.txt
20 +++ b/Documentation/gpio.txt
21 @@ -107,6 +107,16 @@ type of GPIO controller, and on one part
22 The numbers need not be contiguous; either of those platforms could also
23 use numbers 2000-2063 to identify GPIOs in a bank of I2C GPIO expanders.
25 +If you want to initialize a structure with an invalid GPIO number, use
26 +some negative number (perhaps "-EINVAL"); that will never be valid. To
27 +test if a number could reference a GPIO, you may use this predicate:
29 + int gpio_is_valid(int number);
31 +A number that's not valid will be rejected by calls which may request
32 +or free GPIOs (see below). Other numbers may also be rejected; for
33 +example, a number might be valid but unused on a given board.
35 Whether a platform supports multiple GPIO controllers is currently a
36 platform-specific implementation issue.
38 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
39 +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
40 @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ int gpiochip_add(struct gpio_chip *chip)
41 * dynamic allocation. We don't currently support that.
44 - if (chip->base < 0 || (chip->base + chip->ngpio) >= ARCH_NR_GPIOS) {
45 + if (chip->base < 0 || !gpio_is_valid(chip->base + chip->ngpio)) {
49 @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ int gpio_request(unsigned gpio, const ch
51 spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
53 - if (gpio >= ARCH_NR_GPIOS)
54 + if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio))
56 desc = &gpio_desc[gpio];
57 if (desc->chip == NULL)
58 @@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ void gpio_free(unsigned gpio)
60 struct gpio_desc *desc;
62 - if (gpio >= ARCH_NR_GPIOS) {
63 + if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio)) {
64 WARN_ON(extra_checks);
67 @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ const char *gpiochip_is_requested(struct
69 unsigned gpio = chip->base + offset;
71 - if (gpio >= ARCH_NR_GPIOS || gpio_desc[gpio].chip != chip)
72 + if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio) || gpio_desc[gpio].chip != chip)
74 if (test_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &gpio_desc[gpio].flags) == 0)
76 @@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ int gpio_direction_input(unsigned gpio)
78 spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
80 - if (gpio >= ARCH_NR_GPIOS)
81 + if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio))
84 if (!chip || !chip->get || !chip->direction_input)
85 @@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ int gpio_direction_output(unsigned gpio,
87 spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
89 - if (gpio >= ARCH_NR_GPIOS)
90 + if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio))
93 if (!chip || !chip->set || !chip->direction_output)
94 @@ -531,7 +531,7 @@ static int gpiolib_show(struct seq_file
96 /* REVISIT this isn't locked against gpio_chip removal ... */
98 - for (gpio = 0; gpio < ARCH_NR_GPIOS; gpio++) {
99 + for (gpio = 0; gpio_is_valid(gpio); gpio++) {
100 if (chip == gpio_desc[gpio].chip)
102 chip = gpio_desc[gpio].chip;
103 --- a/include/asm-generic/gpio.h
104 +++ b/include/asm-generic/gpio.h
106 #define ARCH_NR_GPIOS 256
109 +static inline int gpio_is_valid(int number)
111 + /* only some non-negative numbers are valid */
112 + return ((unsigned)number) < ARCH_NR_GPIOS;
118 @@ -99,6 +105,16 @@ extern int __gpio_cansleep(unsigned gpio
122 +static inline int __gpio_is_valid(int number)
124 + /* only non-negative numbers are valid */
125 + return number >= 0;
128 +#ifndef gpio_is_valid
129 +#define gpio_is_valid __gpio_is_valid
132 /* platforms that don't directly support access to GPIOs through I2C, SPI,
133 * or other blocking infrastructure can use these wrappers.