1 \chapter{Experiment
3: Movement Behavior with Constant Start/Stop
5 The third experiment tried to correct the slippage of the wheels on the floor
6 that possibly occurred in Experiment~
1 when the Roomba suddenly started or
7 stopped. Due to inertia, the Roomba's movements are delayed and the influence
8 of that effect could be large enough to be measurable.
10 To achieve that, the Roomba's velocity was not changed abruptly, as in
11 Experiment~
1, but it was increased and decreased at a constant rate over a
12 time interval of
1~second. No mean correction was involved as in Experiment~
2.
15 Again, the hardware setup was the same as already in the other two
16 experiments. The application used for measuring data was
17 \prog{soft
\_start\_test}, which is described in Section~
\ref{sec:impl:soft
}.
22 \includegraphics[width=
\textwidth]{images/iz250flur_drive-soft_data.pdf
}
23 \caption{Behavior with constant start/stop acceleration, laminated floor,
24 straight drive movements
}
28 \includegraphics[width=
\textwidth]{images/iz250flur_turn-soft_data.pdf
}
29 \caption{Behavior with constant start/stop acceleration, laminated floor,
34 \includegraphics[width=
\textwidth]{images/seminarraum_drive-soft_data.pdf
}
35 \caption{Behavior with constant start/stop acceleration, carpet floor,
36 straight drive movements
}
40 \includegraphics[width=
\textwidth]{images/seminarraum_turn-soft_data.pdf
}
41 \caption{Behavior with constant start/stop acceleration, carpet floor,
45 The data shows mostly no difference to the original behavior from
46 Experiment~
1. Apparently inertia and slippage do not influence the accuracy of